Loading...

Tree species of the Macoun Club’s study area in Ottawa, inches and feet

Home/Macoun Field Club/The Macoun Club's Nature Study Area/Tree species of the Macoun Club’s study area in Ottawa, inches and feet
Tree species of the Macoun Club’s study area in Ottawa, inches and feet 2017-05-18T20:35:57+00:00
Menu

Tree species of the Macoun Field Club’s nature study area in Ottawa, Ontario

Our basic species list was compiled by the high-school-age group in 1971, with additions being made right down to the present day as we discover isolated individuals of young, apparently new trees like Gray Birch and Amur Maple.

In 1994, we sought out the biggest individual of each species (measuring only the diameter of the trunk). This very limited, single measurement allows comparison with what is known to be possible. Our biggest Butternut and Red Ash trees (both now dead and fallen) closely matched the records set out in the Honour Roll of Ontario Trees, whereas the biggest we have for all our other species are much smaller than the province’s best trees. That probably has to do with our two record-sized trees growing on rich, well watered soil in full sunshine, while the rest are on thin, stony soils, as well as the settlement and fire history.

With two tiny exceptions, our Study Area was burned over in the Great Fire of 1870. Essentially, no tree here can be older than 145 years — or so we thought. In the late summer of 2006, the discovery of certain old-growth indicator lichens (genera Calicium, Chaenotheca, and Chaenothecopsis) led to the recognition of a few acres of unburned cedar swamp. Several of the cedar trees, which have pale grey bark almost an inch thick, appear to be more than 150 years old, but because they are hollow, we can’t be sure.

The other exception was discovered in the summer of 2015, when one of our Study Trees (Hugo Kitching’s “Holey Ash”) snapped off 35 feet above the ground. The annual rings revealed in the fallen top looked very narrow (< 1 mm) so Rob counted them. They showed that after the tree had reached a height of 35 feet, it lived for another 145 years. Its full age might have been 180 years.

The bark on the Holey Ash had always appeared different from other White Ash trees of similar size — the ridge tops had worn away, and the flattening made it resemble a Basswood. In that corner of the Study Tree Woods several of the biggest Sugar Maples also have curiously balding bark, and growth forms that are reminiscent of old-growth trees. But they are all hollow, and cannot be dated. Still, if one White Ash survived the fire of 1870, it is reasonable to think that other trees close by did, too.

Otherwise, since we are really dealing with second-growth forests, in which most trees have a long way to go before they approach in size what is possible for their species, measuring diameter at long intervals should show that the largest keep getting larger. We are seeing this to be true with Eastern Red Cedar, Balsam Fir, and White Poplar. The very reverse, however, is observed in species being killed by introduced diseases — Butternut and White Elm.

See this page with metric measurements

Conifers

Photo of largest White Pine as of 2011

  • Eastern Red Cedar (only one three-trunked tree, 2.5 inches diameter in 1994; 4 inches in 2011)
  • White Cedar (often dominant, but no more regeneration owing to deer browsing; largest in 1994, 24 inches)
  • Balsam Fir (abundant, no more regeneration because of the deer; largest in 1994, 14.5 inches; 17 inches in 2010)
  • Eastern Hemlock (limited distribution; declining health because of Porcupines; largest 25 inches in 1994)
  • Jack Pine (plantation tree; largest in 1994, 12 inches diameter)
  • Red Pine (mainly a plantation tree; largest in 1994, 16 inches; in 2011, 18 in.)Natural grove in the south (largest in 2011, 20 inches)
  • Scotch Pine (scattered plantation trees; largest was 15 inches diameter, but died; the largest in 2011 is 13 inches)
  • White Pine (scattered, except for one forest; largest in 1994, 36 inches (died); in 2011, 34.5 inches, at right)
  • White Spruce (abundant, scattered; largest — open-grown — 30 inches in 1994)
  • Tamarack (limited distribution; largest in 1994, 20 inches)
  • Japanese Larch (planted in the northeast; largest in 2010, 12 inches)

Broad-leaved trees

    • Speckled Alder (common in wetland margins; about 3 inches diameter)
    • Domestic Apple (limited distribution in old orchards; largest diameter 19 inches)
    • Hawthorne (scattered; largest in 1994, 4 inches)
    • Black Ash (limited to damp areas; largest in 1994, 11 inches)
    • Red Ash (uncommon; largest was 51 inches, now dead)
    • White Ash (scattered but common; largest in 1994, 42 inches)
    • Large-toothed Aspen (scattered; largest in 1994, 17.5 inches)
    • Trembing Aspen (scattered; largest in 1994, 20 inches)
    • Balsam Poplar (infrequent; largest in 2011, 19 inches)
    • Eastern Cottonwood (no information)
    • White Poplars (invading widely from their source in the poplar plantation) Largest in 2008: 17 inches; in 2011, 22 inches
    • Hybrid Poplars (Plantation trees; largest in 2011, 23 inches)
    • American Basswood (scattered, common; largest in 1994, 32 inches diameter)
    • American Beech (Scattered, often in clumps; largest in 1994, 33 inches)
    • Blue Beech (scattered, sometimes in groups; largest in 1994, 8 inches)
    • White Birch (scattered; largest in 1994, 24 inches)
    • Gray Birch (three saplings discovered in 2008, largest 5 inches diameter in 2011)
    • Yellow Birch (limited distribution; largest in 1995, 22 inches)
    • Glossy Buckthorn (becoming big enough to be tree-like)
    • European Buckthorn (scattered, largest in 2011, 6 inches diameter)
    • Bitternut Hickory (scattered; largest — open-grown — 33.5 inches in 1994)

Photo of largest Butternut

  • Butternut (largest formerly 41 inches (shown at right); in 2011, 32 inches)
  • Black Cherry (scattered; largest in 1994, 22 inches)
  • Pin Cherry (scattered or groves; largest in 1994, 8 inches)
  • White Elm (scattered; largest in 1974, 34 inches [died]; in 1994, 22 inches [died]; in 2011, 14 inches)
  • Rock Elm (rare; largest in 1994, 20 inches)
  • Slippery Elm (rare; largest in 2011, 18 inches)
  • Siberian Elm (only near an old farmhouse site; no size information)
  • Hop Hornbeam (scattered, common; largest in 1994, 18 inches)
  • Amur Maple (2 specimens known, largest 4 inches diameter)
  • Manitoba Maple (limited distribution; largest in 1994, 21 inches)
  • Red Maple (common; no information)
  • Silver Maple (no information)
  • Sugar Maple (a dominant tree; largest — a forest tree — 34 inches in 1994)
  • Norway Maple (one isolated tree in an old field, and one sapling at P7)
  • Striped Maple (extirpated? Largest was 2 inches in diameter)
  • Mountain Maple (here a shrub of limited distribution, largest 1/2 inch diameter)
  • European Mountain-ash (scarce; largest in 2011, 10 inches)
  • Bur Oak (uncommon; largest in 1994, 30 inches)
  • Red Oak (scattered, common; largest in 1994, 38 inches)
  • Saskatoonberry (scattered, locally common; largest in 1994, 6 inches)
  • Staghorn Sumac (limited to clumps; largest 2 inches)
  • Peachleaf Willow (one only, 12 inches diameter in 2010)

(Macouners! Some of this information needs updating, as the biggest specimens of some species have died, while others may have grown appreciably, and should be rechecked.)


Return to Top.

Eastern Red Cedar

In 45 years, only 3 specimens have been found. Two were little more than knee-high, and one, at least, was removed by persons unknown with a shovel — back in 1973. The one tree that was too big for that was long lost to view among other growing conifers for many years, but was relocated on Dec. 4, 2010.

Eastern Red Cedar is at the very northern edge of its range in Ottawa, and so should not be expected to be a common tree here, the way it is along Hwy. 401 near Belleville.


Eastern Hemlock

Map of study area showing location of large and small Eastern Hemlock
Photo of Porcupine-grazed Eastern Hemlock

Tsuga canadensis

In 1988, members of the Macoun Club’s Junior group surveyed the whole Study Area, and produced a map of this species’ distribution. It seemed to favour the cool margins of conifer forests, especially where water seepage at the foot of slopes made the soil quite moist.

The Hemlock was of special interest to us because it had become the favourite food of a steadily increasing Porcupine population. Over a period of years, mature trees were shorn of their boughs and were dying. Before a Porcupine started dining on the big one at right, its foliage was so full and thick you couldn’t see the sky through it over most of the area of the picture. (No one thought to take a picture then.)


Red Pine

In 1960, about one-quarter of the Study Area was field. Now that same area is covered in 40- to 50-year-old conifer plantations, mainly Red Pine. (Jack Pine was planted where the soil was thin, over rock; White Spruce on wet ground. And a little White Pine was intermixed.)

The trees were planted in rows, behind a tractor. Where soil was thin, it was heaped up in plow furrows first; otherwise, the seedlings were popped into a slit cut by a disc in the sod.

After 25 years, the Ministry of Natural Resources started sending crews in periodically to thin the plantations, which otherwise become overcrowded as the trees grow bigger. The original aim was to produce a commercial crop of trees, but priorities have changed, and some areas are meant to be developed into natural-looking forest.

Quite apart from the plantations, a small population of “wild” Red Pines exists in mixed forest near the hydro corridor in the south. A variety of ages is represented, including trees bigger than any planted elsewhere in the early 1960s.


White Poplars and Eastern Cottonwoods

Photo of poplar plantation

map showing location of White Poplars

In 1974, Macouners noticed what looked like an apple nursery far away on the northern edge of the Study Area. Little trees about half as tall as a man had been set out in neat rows. We ignored them for 14 years and when we finally took a look (photographed in 1988), they had grown up to be poplars, rapid-growing species intended as an experiment in wood production, for fibre. The biggest are now about 22 inches (45 cm) in diameter! Many have since become badly diseased with cankers.

Two varieties, intermixed, appeared to be present. One of them has the smooth, green triangular leaves of Eastern Cottonwood; the other, with leaves that are downy and white below, we now recognize as the European species, White Poplar (Populus alba). This tree is widely thought to have little potential to spread into the natural environment because the solely female trees aren’t supposed to produce seeds. It should spread only by sprouts arising from the roots. But our finding of seedlings, saplings, and small trees as much as 700 metres (nearly half a mile) from the plantation indicate that seeds are being produced.

Return to Top.


The elms: American, Rock, and Slippery

The White or American Elm had been one of the more important trees of open places, swamps, and even forests when the Macoun Club began investigating the Study Area in 1970. At that time it was already dying in great numbers from Dutch Elm Disease. This was a fungus that, having been introduced from the Old World, swept through almost the entire elm population of the continent, killing more than 99.9% of the mature trees. The fungus is carried from tree to tree by tiny bark beetles. Even now, 40 years later, the disease is steadily killing the ever scarcer survivors.

The other elm species are also susceptible to the disease, and being scarcer to begin with, they are that much harder to find now.

As long as they stood, the dead hulks of disease-killed elms provided a bonanza of nesting and roosting holes for birds and mammals. We have seen them used by Tree Swallows, Grackles, Wood Ducks, Pileated Woodpeckers, and Flying Squirrels. But as the rotting stubs topple, there are no replacements.


Striped Maple

This is a small tree by nature, and our Striped Maples were even smaller. Almost all specimens were waist-high, and all were struggling against an unknown fungal canker disease. The bark on the stems died and darkened, become shrunken and shrivelled. The little trees were dying, and most were last seen alive around 1997. There never were more than a dozen in all, and only one had survived through to 2008. It was crushed flat by a falling tree that year, and having been laid low, its leaves were eaten by deer. All were in one corner of the woods where we have our study trees.

Return to Top.


All photos donated or provided by members and leaders, past and present. Created May 2002, and updated Apr. 17, 2011. Butternut section updated June 4 and Mar. 29, 2004; White Poplar section on Feb. 9, 2010; Red Cedar section on Dec. 5, 2010. Coding revised in 2012 and 2016.